The problem I have with the approach of avoiding condemning was is clearly wrong by appealing to context is that every single conflict situation provides such context.
We might as well say that we then throw our ethics away completely, as they can never be actualized in the real world. We’re basically saying these are our theoretical ideals, but we will discard them in any real life situation.
But when are the ethics of war ever going to be relevant other than in an actual war? There’s no point saying attacking non-combatants is prohibited during a time of peace. It has to be made real in the midst of battle.
Without a shadow of doubt, attacking children, infants, the elderly and infirm, and anyone not fighting with you directly, is not allowed. The rules of engagement in a conflict situation are long established, well developed and absolutely clear. Never were they intended as theoretical rules to be learnt and then forgotten.
It is in the messy reality of life that we are tested. How did we behave when faced by real problems? ‘Do the people think they will be left to say, “We believe,” and will not be tested?’ For sure, all of this is a test for us. How will we respond?
Last modified: 21 September 2024
